100+ scripts, 6 adjudicators, 8 weeks. Blind review, rubric-based scoring, a defensible shortlist with the variance notes your committee chair needs.
Literary team, artistic committee, or board subcommittee evaluating next season's candidates. Consolidated rankings appear in one view; reviewers never see each other's scores until reveal.
BFA juries, senior showcase auditions, one-act festival selections. student-record-appropriate, student-appropriate rubrics, with faculty-adjustable reveal timing.
Define scoring dimensions (craft, originality, producibility, fit) and weights. Save rubrics as templates for future cycles.
Send secure reviewer invites. Assign submissions to reviewers automatically or manually. Blind review removes author name, bio, and prior productions.
Reviewers score privately on their own timeline, with a progress tracker. Comments stay private or feed into an anonymized discussion thread.
Weighted-average rankings. Variance alerts on submissions where reviewers strongly disagreed. Exportable final decision report.
Author name and bio hidden during scoring. Revealed only at the reveal phase, if your workflow requires it. Reduces affinity bias that sinks many festivals.
Any scale, any number of dimensions, any weights. Save per-festival rubric libraries for repeatable cycles — next year's call takes five minutes to set up.
Flags submissions where reviewers strongly disagreed, so your committee can discuss them before the final cut instead of letting the average decide silently.
Each reviewer sees their queue, progress, and deadlines. Committee chairs see the whole process. No email threads asking 'how many have you finished?'
Exportable PDF summarizing the full process — scoring, reviewer diversity, variance notes, and the final shortlist. Defensible, archivable, shareable.
Rank into tiers: winner, runner-up, honorable mention, workshop invite. Tiers export as templated announcement letters the committee chair can edit.
Yes — reviewer invites go out as secure magic-link emails. Reviewers never need to create an account or remember a password to complete their work.
Optional demographic self-report fields can be enabled on your call. The data is visible in aggregate (to track equity outcomes) without revealing identity during scoring.
Always. The consolidated ranking is a recommendation; the committee chair's final decision is manual, deliberate, and documented separately in the decision report.
Yes. Reviewer roles can be marked as paid, with hour tracking and invoice-ready exports. Useful for festivals that compensate adjudicators at a per-script rate.
This solution ships with Submissions Company. No separate module, no bolt-on fee.